• <div class="header-image" style="background-image: url(/live/image/gid/4/2957_V6N10_Header.rev.1542820788.jpg);"/><div class="header-background-color"/>

Debunking Keystone XL Myths

April 09, 2014
The Keystone debate is still incredibly polarized.  Myriad conflicting studies, and politically charged bodies, are creating clouded opinions for both U.S. members of Congress and U.S. citizens.  The research on the precise economic and environmental impact of the pipeline is still forthcoming.  But, in the end, the facts may be more exaggerated at both ends of the spectrum

By Alexander Gray, W’17 C’17


The Keystone XL pipeline has dominated the energy policy debate in Washington for the past several years of President Obama’s two terms.  While both sides of the political aisle have demonstrated strong support and opposition,  the general public appears to be in favor of the project—which is slated to be owned and operated by TransCanada.  According to a 2014 Washington Post poll, 65% of U.S. citizens support construction of the pipeline, while only 22% oppose it.  Another 85% of the people surveyed believe the pipeline will create a significant number of jobs, while only 47% believe it poses a significant threat to the environment—a primary concern of President Obama and his Democrat colleagues who are hesitant about moving forward with the project.1

As a supporter of both greater North American energy independence, and job creation in the United States, the Keystone pipeline makes perfect sense to me.  On the surface, its economic benefits seem to outweigh the potential environmental concerns.  But, is Keystone really the best solution for combating our economic woes and reliance on oil from the Middle East?  And, is the environmental impact really so marginal that we can afford to implement greater ease in burning gas in our existing age of hyper-industrialism?  These are the questions I endeavored to answer in my recent quest to gain a greater understanding of the proposed Keystone XL project.

In a world of 24/7 cable news, and polarized politics, it is easy to get lost in the rhetoric of the Keystone XL debate.  Many Democrats claim that it is harmful for the environment.  Most Republicans try to spin the positive economic benefits of the project. Both sides, however, fail to cite specific figures or studies to substantiate their claims.  According to a study by Cornell University’s Global Labor Institute, total economic exposure for the project’s construction in the United States is only estimated to be $3.3 billion, as compared to the $7.7 billion touted by Republicans and lobbyists for TransCanada.  Additionally, TransCanada’s claim that the Keystone project would create 20,000 direct-construction jobs in the U.S. is unsubstantiated.  According to a January 2014 State Department study, there would be only 3,900 direct construction jobs created as a result of the project.  TransCanada asserts that total direct and indirect U.S. job creation would be 119,000.  However, the State Department finds that the pipeline would only yield a total of 42,000 U.S. jobs.2  Finally, a common claim among the pipeline’s proponents is that Keystone would lead to lower gasoline prices for consumers across the United States due to increased access.  But, a Cornell survey finds that the pipeline would divert existing shipments of Canadian crude oil from Midwestern refineries to the Gulf of Mexico, which would result in higher gasoline prices for Midwestern consumers.3

But a recent study in the Energy Journal refuted the claim that gas prices would increase as a result of the pipeline.  In fact, the study finds that gasoline prices in the Midwest are not even influenced by refinery activity in the region.[1]  This is because of the recent influx of U.S. oil that is being produced under the global market price, and the oil boom in North Dakota. Concerns from commercial agriculture also pervade the Keystone debate.  In Nebraska, where 6% of American agricultural receipts are generated, farmers are concerned about groundwater contamination.  The cleanup from a 2010 Canadian pipeline spill in Michigan has already generated over $1 billion in damages.  A potential spill from Keystone, in a more agriculturally dominant state like Nebraska, could cause devastating damage that to the state.5  As a final affront to opponents of the Keystone pipeline, Cornell cites the possibility for a recession in the growing U.S. green energy sector, which has already generated 2.7 million U.S. jobs through the nation’s increased focus on fossil fuel production and the associated lower prices (CITE).


Clearly, the Keystone debate is still incredibly polarized.  Myriad conflicting studies, and politically charged bodies, are creating clouded opinions for both U.S. members of Congress and U.S. citizens.  The research on the precise economic and environmental impact of the pipeline is still forthcoming.  But, in the end, the facts may be more exaggerated at both ends of the spectrum.  At some point, the trigger will be pulled in Washington by whichever stakeholder has the most to gain from the pipeline, or by whomever believes that it is the right thing to do for the good of the American people. The only remaining question is when.  The answer to this question will likely depend on whether there is a change in the political command of the White House, and the reliability of future research.  Ultimately, Keystone XL will remain a symbol for policy rhetoric in this country because it is a symbol that has been sparking debate across diverse communities with myriad interests— a refreshing outcome for Washington, D.C.


Borenstein, S., & Kellogg, R. (2014). The Incidence of an Oil Glut: Who Benefits from Cheap Crude Oil in the Midwest?. Energy Journal35(1), 15-33.

Eilperin, J., & Clement, S. (2014, March 07). New Post-ABC News poll: Keystone XL project overwhelmingly favored by Americans. Retrieved from

Skinner, L., & Sweeney, S. (2012). Pipe Dreams? Jobs Gained, Jobs Lost by the ConstruCtion of Keystone XL (Rep.). Itaca, NY: Cornell University Global Labor Institute.

Sweeney, S., & McKibben, B. (2011, October 05). No to the Keystone XL pipeline. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2011/oct/05/opinion/la-oe-mckibben-tarsands-pipeline-20111005

Walker, G. (n.d.). Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Project (Vol. 1, Rep.). Washington D.C.: Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-post-abc-news-poll-keystone-xl-project-overwhelmingly-favored-by-americans/2014/03/06/d74c58c6-a4a1-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.htmlWoods, E. D. (2013). Line in the sand. Virginia Quarterly Review89(4), 140-157.



Student Blog Disclaimer
  • The views expressed on the Student Blog are the author’s opinions and don’t necessarily represent the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative’s strategies, recommendations, or opinions.


  • <h3>Internal Revenue Service: Tax Statistics</h3><p><img width="155" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image486 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg 2x" data-max-w="463" data-max-h="596"/>Find statistics on business tax, individual tax, charitable and exempt organizations, IRS operations and budget, and income (SOI), as well as statistics by form, products, publications, papers, and other IRS data.</p><p> Quick link to <strong>Tax Statistics, where you will find a wide range of tables, articles, and data</strong> that describe and measure elements of the U.S. tax system: <a href="http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2" target="_blank">http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The World Bank Data (U.S.)</h3><p><img width="130" height="118" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image484 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1406" data-max-h="1275"/>The <strong>World Bank</strong> provides World Development Indicators, Surveys, and data on Finances and Climate Change.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states" target="_blank">http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>MapStats</h3><p> A feature of FedStats, MapStats allows users to search for <strong>state, county, city, congressional district, or Federal judicial district data</strong> (demographic, economic, and geographic).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/" target="_blank">http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED®)</h3><p><strong><img width="180" height="79" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/79/481_fred-logo.rev.1407788243.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image481 lw_align_right" data-max-w="222" data-max-h="97"/>An online database consisting of more than 72,000 economic data time series from 54 national, international, public, and private sources.</strong> FRED®, created and maintained by Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, goes far beyond simply providing data: It combines data with a powerful mix of tools that help the user understand, interact with, display, and disseminate the data.</p><p> Quick link to data page: <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series" target="_blank">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>NOAA National Climatic Data Center</h3><p><img width="200" height="198" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image483 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 3x" data-max-w="954" data-max-h="945"/>NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) is responsible for preserving, monitoring, assessing, and providing public access to the Nation’s treasure of <strong>climate and historical weather data and information</strong>.</p><p> Quick link to home page: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCDC’s climate and weather datasets, products, and various web pages and resources: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links</a></p><p> Quick link to Text & Map Search: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>HUD State of the Cities Data Systems</h3><p><strong><img width="200" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image482 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 3x" data-max-w="612" data-max-h="613"/>The SOCDS provides data for individual Metropolitan Areas, Central Cities, and Suburbs.</strong> It is a portal for non-national data made available through a number of outside institutions (e.g. Census, BLS, FBI and others).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html" target="_blank">http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Aviation Administration: Accident & Incident Data</h3><p><img width="100" height="100" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image80 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 3x" data-max-w="550" data-max-h="550"/>The NTSB issues an accident report following each investigation. These reports are available online for reports issued since 1996, with older reports coming online soon. The reports listing is sortable by the event date, report date, city, and state.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/" target="_blank">http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Bureau of Economic Research (Public Use Data Archive)</h3><p><img width="180" height="43" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/43/478_nber.rev.1407530465.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image478 lw_align_right" data-max-w="329" data-max-h="79"/>Founded in 1920, the <strong>National Bureau of Economic Research</strong> is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a greater understanding of how the economy works. The NBER is committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community.</p><p> Quick Link to <strong>Public Use Data Archive</strong>: <a href="http://www.nber.org/data/" target="_blank">http://www.nber.org/data/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Center for Education Statistics</h3><p><strong><img width="400" height="80" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/400/height/80/479_nces.rev.1407787656.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image479 lw_align_right" data-max-w="400" data-max-h="80"/>The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting and analyzing data related to education in the U.S. and other nations.</strong> NCES is located within the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences. NCES has an extensive Statistical Standards Program that consults and advises on methodological and statistical aspects involved in the design, collection, and analysis of data collections in the Center. To learn more about the NCES, <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/about/" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p><p> Quick link to NCES Data Tools: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4</a></p><p> Quick link to Quick Tables and Figures: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCES Fast Facts (Note: The primary purpose of the Fast Facts website is to provide users with concise information on a range of educational issues, from early childhood to adult learning.): <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/#</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>USDA Nutrition Assistance Data</h3><p><img width="180" height="124" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image485 lw_align_right" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1233" data-max-h="850"/>Data and research regarding the following <strong>USDA Nutrition Assistance</strong> programs are available through this site:</p><ul><li>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) </li><li>Food Distribution Programs </li><li>School Meals </li><li>Women, Infants and Children </li></ul><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics" target="_blank">http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The Penn World Table</h3><p> The Penn World Table provides purchasing power parity and national income accounts converted to international prices for 189 countries/territories for some or all of the years 1950-2010.</p><p><a href="https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt71/pwt71_form.php" target="_blank">Quick link.</a> </p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Congressional Budget Office</h3><p><img width="180" height="180" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/180/380_cbo-logo.rev.1406822035.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image380 lw_align_right" data-max-w="180" data-max-h="180"/>Since its founding in 1974, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has produced independent analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process.</p><p> The agency is strictly nonpartisan and conducts objective, impartial analysis, which is evident in each of the dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates that its economists and policy analysts produce each year. CBO does not make policy recommendations, and each report and cost estimate discloses the agency’s assumptions and methodologies. <strong>CBO provides budgetary and economic information in a variety of ways and at various points in the legislative process.</strong> Products include baseline budget projections and economic forecasts, analysis of the President’s budget, cost estimates, analysis of federal mandates, working papers, and more.</p><p> Quick link to Products page: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products</a></p><p> Quick link to Topics: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/topics" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/topics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>