• <div class="header-image" style="background-image: url(/live/image/gid/4/2725_V6N6_Header.rev.1531768301.jpg);">​</div><div class="header-background-color"/>

Potential for Innovation in Election Technology

July 16, 2018

The 2000 presidential election posed countless issues, including butterfly ballots, partially punched cards, four to six million lost votes, and outraged citizens across the political spectrum. These issues led California Institute of Technology president David Baltimore and Massachusetts Institute of Technology president Charles Vest to approach the election technology failure more scientifically. With a team of computer scientists, mechanical engineers, and political scientists, they reimagined—and reengineered—the election process.[1] Although Baltimore and Vest pioneered advancements in the election process, the reliability of voting infrastructure today still remains questionable. As we approach the upcoming election cycle this Fall, policy and technology experts must come together to rectify a failing system.

Evolution of Election Technology

Over the last two decades, with the establishment of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in 2002, digital technology has gradually replaced paper voting systems. Since the EAC administered the first Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) in 2004, the U.S. has employed eight different categories of voting systems: optical scans, two versions of direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines, hybrid voting machines, hand-counted paper ballots, punch cards, lever machines, and other systems. The biennial survey documents the nation’s transition away from many of these systems, including lever machines and punch-card ballots. By 2016, approximately 61% of jurisdictions were using optical scan machines to scan and digitize paper ballots.[2]

Image: Relative deployment of different voting systems by vendor. Source: Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative

Image: Relative deployment of different voting systems by vendor. Source: Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative

Despite significant restructuring of voting systems since 2000, outdated voting machines plague countless localities today. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan law and public policy institute, as of 2016, an estimated 43 states were using voting machines purchased over 10 years prior, of which 14 states were using machines purchased over 15 years prior. The collapse of these systems, coupled with the inability of states to fund their replacement, poses a serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process. More specifically, elected officials identify four main concerns with aging machines: (1) equipment failure around major elections, (2) undermined confidence in election results, (3) inability of current computers to connect to outdated voting software, and (4) replacement of machine parts that are no longer manufactured.[3]

Image: Age of voting machines in U.S. states as of 2016. Source: Brennan Center for Justice

Image: Age of voting machines in U.S. states as of 2016. Source: Brennan Center for Justice

Current State of the Industry

Part of the failure with these archaic machines can be attributed to the lack of transparency and competitive dynamics of the election technology industry. The industry earns approximately $300 million annually, a relatively small figure compared to the $80 billion annual federal IT expenditure. Dominated by three firms that are neither publicly nor independently held, very little data even exists on the industry. Moreover, election technology decisions are spread over 10,000 county officials; this severely fragmented customer base renders composite market information scarce.

Given these industry dynamics, external IT vendors unsurprisingly have little interest in entering the market. Vendors have expressed concern over the enormous development costs and delays associated with certifying new voting technology, which disincentivize innovation. Consequently, both vendors and customers find themselves ‘stuck’ with older technologies nearing the end of their 10- to 15-year product lifecycles. In addition, because of these relatively lengthy lifecycles, competition for technology replacement is centered around only a limited number of events. These barriers thus constrain industry growth and the potential of refurbishing outmoded systems.[4]

Strategies for Developing New Election Systems

In light of this limited industry growth, election officials have proposed various strategies to spur the creation of new systems. Coalition formation emerges as a common solution in smaller districts, where election officials struggle to obtain products customized for idiosyncratic local requirements (e.g. budget constraints, voting format preferences, multilingual voting, disability access). By minimizing transaction cost and aggregating buyer power, customer coalitions would facilitate bargaining for customized election products, thereby lowering prices.

Some larger counties—including Travis County, TX and Los Angeles County, CA—have spearheaded the development of open-source systems.[5] In the current market, customers have little access to the underlying code that powers a voting system. An open source model, however, makes that code public, allowing professionals to inspect and modify it. For instance, OSET Institute, a Silicon Valley nonprofit research corporation, is launching the TrustTheVote project to build flexible, adaptable election administration software using open-source principles. With greater citizen oversight, this model fosters transparency and legitimacy in election administration.[6]

The open-source systems developed in Travis County and LA County are examples of modularity. Modularity refers to the structural flexibility of modern IT system designs, which integrate different combinations of components into a broad blueprint. From a regulatory standpoint, modularity overcomes current requirements that mandate voting systems be presented in their entirety before testing for certification. Instead, professionals can construct larger platforms from smaller components without fully redesigning code. Since modularity involves separating programs into independent, interchangeable parts, the move towards a more modular election technology system would promote mass market hardware, encourage reuse, reduce development cost, and support timely equipment upgrades.[7]

Funding the Development of New Election Systems

While various strategies exist for revamping election technology, states struggle with funding these new systems. In 2002, through the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), Congress allocated $3 billion to states to purchase new voting technology. However, as of 2016, most of these funds have been depleted; in fact, less than 10% of original funds remain in 65% of states and territories.[8]

The Center for American Progress, a public policy research organization, estimates that updating outdated voting machines would cost approximately $1 billion, and replacing paperless machines would cost between $130 million and $400 million. Unfortunately, 80% of election officials responded in a survey that they did not have sufficient funds.[9]

Although many believe the federal government has an obligation to allocate funds for new election technology, federal funds will not be available anytime soon, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), a bipartisan non-governmental organization that assists state legislatures. This is because HAVA failed to address the ongoing costs of maintaining voting equipment, and Congress has not yet seen a new proposal requesting the use of federal funds to overhaul election technology. The NCSL proposes a number of funding options, including direct appropriation to purchase new equipment statewide, splitting the cost between states and counties, and setting up grant programs or low-interest programs for counties.[10]

Ultimately, upgrading voting technology calls for a combined effort. While funding poses a persistent challenge, the problem also rests in technological inefficiency, political inaction, customer fragmentation, and vendor uncertainty. Solving this issue requires more than just money; it demands a system of vendors, customers, and policymakers who will cooperate to dismantle a rigid, stagnant election technology industry.

Student Blog Disclaimer
  • The views expressed on the Student Blog are the author’s opinions and don’t necessarily represent the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative’s strategies, recommendations, or opinions.


  [1] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-2000-election-reengin/

  [2] https://www.eac.gov/documents/2018/05/01/eavs-deep-dive-election-technology/

  [3] https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Americas_Voting_Machines_At_Risk.pdf (pages 8-19)

  [4] https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/live/files/270-the-business-of-voting (pages 23-26)

  [5] https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/live/files/270-the-business-of-voting (pages 42)

  [6] http://www.osetfoundation.org/why/

  [7] https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/live/files/270-the-business-of-voting (pages 47-48)

  [8] https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/live/files/270-the-business-of-voting (pages 11-12)

  [9] https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/democracy/reports/2017/09/11/438684/election-infrastructure-vulnerabilities-solutions/

  [10] http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/funding-election-technology.aspx


  • <h3>Federal Aviation Administration: Accident & Incident Data</h3><p><img width="100" height="100" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image80 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 3x" data-max-w="550" data-max-h="550"/>The NTSB issues an accident report following each investigation. These reports are available online for reports issued since 1996, with older reports coming online soon. The reports listing is sortable by the event date, report date, city, and state.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/" target="_blank">http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>USDA Nutrition Assistance Data</h3><p><img width="180" height="124" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image485 lw_align_right" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1233" data-max-h="850"/>Data and research regarding the following <strong>USDA Nutrition Assistance</strong> programs are available through this site:</p><ul><li>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) </li><li>Food Distribution Programs </li><li>School Meals </li><li>Women, Infants and Children </li></ul><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics" target="_blank">http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>HUD State of the Cities Data Systems</h3><p><strong><img width="200" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image482 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 3x" data-max-w="612" data-max-h="613"/>The SOCDS provides data for individual Metropolitan Areas, Central Cities, and Suburbs.</strong> It is a portal for non-national data made available through a number of outside institutions (e.g. Census, BLS, FBI and others).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html" target="_blank">http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Internal Revenue Service: Tax Statistics</h3><p><img width="155" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image486 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg 2x" data-max-w="463" data-max-h="596"/>Find statistics on business tax, individual tax, charitable and exempt organizations, IRS operations and budget, and income (SOI), as well as statistics by form, products, publications, papers, and other IRS data.</p><p> Quick link to <strong>Tax Statistics, where you will find a wide range of tables, articles, and data</strong> that describe and measure elements of the U.S. tax system: <a href="http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2" target="_blank">http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>MapStats</h3><p> A feature of FedStats, MapStats allows users to search for <strong>state, county, city, congressional district, or Federal judicial district data</strong> (demographic, economic, and geographic).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/" target="_blank">http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>NOAA National Climatic Data Center</h3><p><img width="200" height="198" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image483 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 3x" data-max-w="954" data-max-h="945"/>NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) is responsible for preserving, monitoring, assessing, and providing public access to the Nation’s treasure of <strong>climate and historical weather data and information</strong>.</p><p> Quick link to home page: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCDC’s climate and weather datasets, products, and various web pages and resources: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links</a></p><p> Quick link to Text & Map Search: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Congressional Budget Office</h3><p><img width="180" height="180" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/180/380_cbo-logo.rev.1406822035.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image380 lw_align_right" data-max-w="180" data-max-h="180"/>Since its founding in 1974, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has produced independent analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process.</p><p> The agency is strictly nonpartisan and conducts objective, impartial analysis, which is evident in each of the dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates that its economists and policy analysts produce each year. CBO does not make policy recommendations, and each report and cost estimate discloses the agency’s assumptions and methodologies. <strong>CBO provides budgetary and economic information in a variety of ways and at various points in the legislative process.</strong> Products include baseline budget projections and economic forecasts, analysis of the President’s budget, cost estimates, analysis of federal mandates, working papers, and more.</p><p> Quick link to Products page: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products</a></p><p> Quick link to Topics: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/topics" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/topics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The Penn World Table</h3><p> The Penn World Table provides purchasing power parity and national income accounts converted to international prices for 189 countries/territories for some or all of the years 1950-2010.</p><p><a href="https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt71/pwt71_form.php" target="_blank">Quick link.</a> </p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Center for Education Statistics</h3><p><strong><img width="400" height="80" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/400/height/80/479_nces.rev.1407787656.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image479 lw_align_right" data-max-w="400" data-max-h="80"/>The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting and analyzing data related to education in the U.S. and other nations.</strong> NCES is located within the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences. NCES has an extensive Statistical Standards Program that consults and advises on methodological and statistical aspects involved in the design, collection, and analysis of data collections in the Center. To learn more about the NCES, <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/about/" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p><p> Quick link to NCES Data Tools: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4</a></p><p> Quick link to Quick Tables and Figures: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCES Fast Facts (Note: The primary purpose of the Fast Facts website is to provide users with concise information on a range of educational issues, from early childhood to adult learning.): <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/#</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The World Bank Data (U.S.)</h3><p><img width="130" height="118" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image484 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1406" data-max-h="1275"/>The <strong>World Bank</strong> provides World Development Indicators, Surveys, and data on Finances and Climate Change.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states" target="_blank">http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Bureau of Economic Research (Public Use Data Archive)</h3><p><img width="180" height="43" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/43/478_nber.rev.1407530465.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image478 lw_align_right" data-max-w="329" data-max-h="79"/>Founded in 1920, the <strong>National Bureau of Economic Research</strong> is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a greater understanding of how the economy works. The NBER is committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community.</p><p> Quick Link to <strong>Public Use Data Archive</strong>: <a href="http://www.nber.org/data/" target="_blank">http://www.nber.org/data/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED®)</h3><p><strong><img width="180" height="79" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/79/481_fred-logo.rev.1407788243.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image481 lw_align_right" data-max-w="222" data-max-h="97"/>An online database consisting of more than 72,000 economic data time series from 54 national, international, public, and private sources.</strong> FRED®, created and maintained by Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, goes far beyond simply providing data: It combines data with a powerful mix of tools that help the user understand, interact with, display, and disseminate the data.</p><p> Quick link to data page: <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series" target="_blank">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>