• <div class="header-image" style="background-image: url(/live/image/gid/4/2708_V6N5_Header.rev.1529519084.jpg);">​</div><div class="header-background-color"/>

Forced by the Fine Print: The Implications and Future Prospects of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

June 25, 2018

Kaylee Heffelfinger of Arizona and Shahriar Jabbari of California had sued Wells Fargo for opening seven unauthorized bank accounts in their names, but their lawsuits were dismissed due to analogous mandatory arbitration clauses. Their cases were part of a larger scandal in which Wells Fargo opened at least 3.5 million unauthorized accounts on behalf of their customers but then astonishingly held those customers to the mandatory arbitration clauses they had signed for their legitimate accounts. Given the harm that mandatory arbitration may cause consumers, it is critical for policymakers to consider the implications of mandatory arbitration.

While Army National Guard Sergeant Charles Beard was valiantly serving his country in Iraq, his family’s car was being repossessed back home in California. This occurred despite the legal protections afforded to active duty service members which prohibit car lenders from repossessing a vehicle without a court order. However, when Sgt. Beard attempted to sue the car lender in court, his case was dismissed due to a clause in the fine print of his loan contract which forced him to resolve any disputes with the lender through mandatory arbitration. [1] Similarly, both Kaylee Heffelfinger of Arizona and Shahriar Jabbari of California had sued Wells Fargo for opening seven unauthorized bank accounts in their names, but their lawsuits were dismissed due to analogous mandatory arbitration clauses. [2] Their cases were part of a larger scandal in which Wells Fargo opened at least 3.5 million unauthorized accounts on behalf of their customers but then astonishingly held those customers to the mandatory arbitration clauses they had signed for their legitimate accounts. [3] Given the harm that mandatory arbitration may cause consumers, it is critical for policymakers to consider the implications of mandatory arbitration.

(Image: Substantive Outcome by Claim Type for Affirmative Consumer Claims in Arbitrator-Resolved Disputes, 2010-2011. Source: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)

(Image: Substantive Outcome by Claim Type for Affirmative Consumer Claims in Arbitrator-Resolved Disputes, 2010-2011. Source: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)

 

Mandatory arbitration requires a company and consumer to adjudicate any dispute before a neutral, third party individual (the arbitrator) rather than a judge or jury. It was first permitted in 1925 with the passage of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and over the years has become pervasively used in consumer contracts. [4] For instance, a 2015 report by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that 99% of payday loan providers in California and Texas, 92% of prepaid card agreements, 88% of mobile phone providers who allow third party charges on bills, 86% of the largest private student loan lenders, 53% of credit card issuers, and 44% of insured checking account deposits are all covered by forced arbitration clauses. This translates to tens of millions of consumers bound by such provisions. [5]

Business interests promote these clauses as a more efficient means of handling disputes since arbitration can be faster and less expensive than proceeding to trial. [6] Furthermore, since these provisions often prohibit class action litigation, they may limit costly and frivolous lawsuits which disproportionately benefit plaintiff’s attorneys through exorbitant fees at the expense of the economy. [7] Companies further assert that these cost savings enable them to ultimately provide cheaper products and services to consumers. [8]

However, consumer advocates argue that forced arbitration clauses unduly favor businesses and inhibit the resolution of legitimate disputes. Since these clauses are often hidden in the fine print of contracts, the CFPB found that more than 75 percent of consumers surveyed did not know whether they were subject to forced arbitration in their financial service contracts and fewer than 7 percent of those covered by forced arbitration clauses realized that the clauses blocked their right to sue in court. [9] Furthermore, arbitration unfortunately provides few protections for consumers since the arbitrator is not required to have a legal background, their decision does not need to be based on law or established precedent, the proceedings are kept confidential, and there are minimal opportunities for appeal. Moreover, consumers may be burdened with steep costs including long-distance travel to participate in the hearing, filing fees, and a portion of the arbitrator’s charges which are typically $200-300 per hour. [10] Additionally, companies can craft the arbitration rules to their advantage, and since the consumer has absolutely no say in the matter, neither the company nor the arbitrator has an incentive to make the process fair or balanced. This concern is exacerbated by the fact that the arbitrators depend on the companies for repeat business which may bias their decisions. [11] Most troubling is that these clauses prevent class action lawsuits which are a critical tool that enable consumers to join together and to recuperate damages when the size of one claim is too small to justify the legal costs.

In fact, data compiled by the CFPB demonstrates the chilling effect of mandatory arbitration clauses. The CFPB calculated that each year roughly 32 million consumers were eligible for financial redress totaling $2.7 billion under federal class action lawsuits. This starkly contrasts with the mere 600 arbitration cases that were filed by individuals each year. During 2010 and 2011, consumers filed 1,060 arbitration cases but only received relief in 78 cases, totaling less than $400,000. Conversely, businesses were able to recover $2.8 million from the arbitration cases they filed against consumers during that same time period. [12] These statistics clearly demonstrate that mandatory arbitration clauses favor businesses and act as a barrier to consumers pursuing disputes. Equally important, the CFPB found that there is no statistically significant evidence to support the claim that mandatory arbitration clauses result in lower prices for consumers. [13]

As a result of these disconcerting findings, the CFPB issued a final rule in July 2017 to ban clauses in consumer financial product contracts that prohibit class action lawsuits. However, in October 2017, Congress exercised its power under the Congressional Review Act to overturn this rule. [14] Unfortunately, the courts also have not been an effective venue for consumer advocates to challenge mandatory arbitration clauses. In a long series of precedents, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld mandatory arbitration provisions based on the FAA and overturned efforts by individual states to limit the applicability of these clauses. Most recently, on May 21, 2018, the Supreme Court once again sustained mandatory arbitration clauses in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis. This suit challenged such provisions in employment contracts, arguing that the ban on class action lawsuits violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by prohibiting workers from engaging in a form of collective action. However, the Court found that the NLRA provided no such right to class action lawsuits and thus did not conflict with the FAA. [15] The Court’s decision in this case and many precedents indicate that it will continue to interpret the FAA broadly. As a result, state laws and similar lawsuits will likely be unsuccessful in challenging mandatory arbitration clauses.

Consequently, the only way to address the explosion of these provisions will be for Congress to pass new legislation limiting their use. For instance, the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2017 (H.R. 1374/S. 537) would prohibit the enforcement of mandatory arbitration clauses for antitrust, civil rights, employment, or consumer disputes which occurred after the clause was signed. Similarly, the Restoring Statutory Rights and Interests of the States Act of 2017 (H.R. 1396/S. 550) would forbid the enforcement of mandatory arbitration clauses for disputes regarding the violation of federal and state statutes, the U.S. Constitution, or a state constitution if the dispute occurred after the agreement was signed. This Act would also allow courts to invalidate mandatory arbitration clauses if they are unconscionable, lack a meeting of the minds, or violate contract law or “public policy.” Finally, the Safety Over Arbitration Act of 2017 (S. 542) would ban mandatory arbitration for disputes regarding public health or safety hazards if the dispute occurred after the agreement was signed, and the Court Legal Access and Student Support Act of 2017 (H.R. 2301/S. 553) would outlaw mandatory arbitration clauses for any dispute between a student and higher education institution. [16] Evidently, unless Congress takes action by passing one of these bills or a similar piece of legislation, consumers will continue to be forced by the fine print to surrender their rights.

Student Blog Disclaimer
  • The views expressed on the Student Blog are the author’s opinions and don’t necessarily represent the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative’s strategies, recommendations, or opinions.

References

  [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/business/wronged-troops-are-denied-recourse-by-arbitration-clauses.html

  [2] http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-wells-arbitration-20160926-snap-story.html

  [3]   http://fortune.com/2017/10/03/tim-sloan-testimony-forced-arbitration/

  [4] https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44960.pdf, 1.

  [5] https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201503_cfpb_factsheet_arbitration-study.pdf

  [6] http://www.crs.gov/LegalSidebar/Details/1574

  [7] https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10142.pdf

  [8] http://www.crs.gov/LegalSidebar/Details/1574

  [9] https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201503_cfpb_factsheet_arbitration-study.pdf

  [10] https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/shopping/the-arbitration-clause-hidden-in-many-consumer-contracts

  [11] https://consumersunion.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CU-comments-CFPB-proposed-arbitration-rule-8-22-16-FINAL.pdf

  [12] https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201503_cfpb_factsheet_arbitration-study.pdf

  [13] https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201503_cfpb_factsheet_arbitration-study.pdf

  [14] https://www.wsj.com/articles/congress-votes-to-overturn-cfpb-arbitration-rule-1508897968

  [15] https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10142.pdf

  [16]https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44960.pdf, 16-17.

PENN WHARTON PPI
RESOURCE SPOTLIGHT:

  • <h3>USDA Nutrition Assistance Data</h3><p><img width="180" height="124" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image485 lw_align_right" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1233" data-max-h="850"/>Data and research regarding the following <strong>USDA Nutrition Assistance</strong> programs are available through this site:</p><ul><li>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) </li><li>Food Distribution Programs </li><li>School Meals </li><li>Women, Infants and Children </li></ul><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics" target="_blank">http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>HUD State of the Cities Data Systems</h3><p><strong><img width="200" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image482 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 3x" data-max-w="612" data-max-h="613"/>The SOCDS provides data for individual Metropolitan Areas, Central Cities, and Suburbs.</strong> It is a portal for non-national data made available through a number of outside institutions (e.g. Census, BLS, FBI and others).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html" target="_blank">http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>NOAA National Climatic Data Center</h3><p><img width="200" height="198" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image483 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 3x" data-max-w="954" data-max-h="945"/>NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) is responsible for preserving, monitoring, assessing, and providing public access to the Nation’s treasure of <strong>climate and historical weather data and information</strong>.</p><p> Quick link to home page: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCDC’s climate and weather datasets, products, and various web pages and resources: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links</a></p><p> Quick link to Text & Map Search: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Congressional Budget Office</h3><p><img width="180" height="180" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/180/380_cbo-logo.rev.1406822035.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image380 lw_align_right" data-max-w="180" data-max-h="180"/>Since its founding in 1974, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has produced independent analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process.</p><p> The agency is strictly nonpartisan and conducts objective, impartial analysis, which is evident in each of the dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates that its economists and policy analysts produce each year. CBO does not make policy recommendations, and each report and cost estimate discloses the agency’s assumptions and methodologies. <strong>CBO provides budgetary and economic information in a variety of ways and at various points in the legislative process.</strong> Products include baseline budget projections and economic forecasts, analysis of the President’s budget, cost estimates, analysis of federal mandates, working papers, and more.</p><p> Quick link to Products page: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products</a></p><p> Quick link to Topics: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/topics" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/topics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Aviation Administration: Accident & Incident Data</h3><p><img width="100" height="100" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image80 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 3x" data-max-w="550" data-max-h="550"/>The NTSB issues an accident report following each investigation. These reports are available online for reports issued since 1996, with older reports coming online soon. The reports listing is sortable by the event date, report date, city, and state.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/" target="_blank">http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Internal Revenue Service: Tax Statistics</h3><p><img width="155" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image486 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg 2x" data-max-w="463" data-max-h="596"/>Find statistics on business tax, individual tax, charitable and exempt organizations, IRS operations and budget, and income (SOI), as well as statistics by form, products, publications, papers, and other IRS data.</p><p> Quick link to <strong>Tax Statistics, where you will find a wide range of tables, articles, and data</strong> that describe and measure elements of the U.S. tax system: <a href="http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2" target="_blank">http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED®)</h3><p><strong><img width="180" height="79" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/79/481_fred-logo.rev.1407788243.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image481 lw_align_right" data-max-w="222" data-max-h="97"/>An online database consisting of more than 72,000 economic data time series from 54 national, international, public, and private sources.</strong> FRED®, created and maintained by Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, goes far beyond simply providing data: It combines data with a powerful mix of tools that help the user understand, interact with, display, and disseminate the data.</p><p> Quick link to data page: <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series" target="_blank">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The World Bank Data (U.S.)</h3><p><img width="130" height="118" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image484 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1406" data-max-h="1275"/>The <strong>World Bank</strong> provides World Development Indicators, Surveys, and data on Finances and Climate Change.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states" target="_blank">http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>MapStats</h3><p> A feature of FedStats, MapStats allows users to search for <strong>state, county, city, congressional district, or Federal judicial district data</strong> (demographic, economic, and geographic).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/" target="_blank">http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The Penn World Table</h3><p> The Penn World Table provides purchasing power parity and national income accounts converted to international prices for 189 countries/territories for some or all of the years 1950-2010.</p><p><a href="https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt71/pwt71_form.php" target="_blank">Quick link.</a> </p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Center for Education Statistics</h3><p><strong><img width="400" height="80" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/400/height/80/479_nces.rev.1407787656.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image479 lw_align_right" data-max-w="400" data-max-h="80"/>The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting and analyzing data related to education in the U.S. and other nations.</strong> NCES is located within the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences. NCES has an extensive Statistical Standards Program that consults and advises on methodological and statistical aspects involved in the design, collection, and analysis of data collections in the Center. To learn more about the NCES, <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/about/" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p><p> Quick link to NCES Data Tools: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4</a></p><p> Quick link to Quick Tables and Figures: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCES Fast Facts (Note: The primary purpose of the Fast Facts website is to provide users with concise information on a range of educational issues, from early childhood to adult learning.): <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/#</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Bureau of Economic Research (Public Use Data Archive)</h3><p><img width="180" height="43" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/43/478_nber.rev.1407530465.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image478 lw_align_right" data-max-w="329" data-max-h="79"/>Founded in 1920, the <strong>National Bureau of Economic Research</strong> is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a greater understanding of how the economy works. The NBER is committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community.</p><p> Quick Link to <strong>Public Use Data Archive</strong>: <a href="http://www.nber.org/data/" target="_blank">http://www.nber.org/data/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>