• <div class="header-image" style="background-image: url(/live/image/gid/4/2801_V6N8_Header.rev.1537380633.jpg);">​</div><div class="header-background-color"/>

Impacts of Lower Socioeconomic Status on College Admissions

January 24, 2018

The underrepresentation of low-income students at selective institutions of higher learning may point to strong disadvantages in the college admissions process that are unique to this demographic. A combination of a lack of access to resources to solidify prerequisites for acceptance, strong barriers to apply, and unfavorable admissions review procedures, make it significantly harder for low-income students to make it through the admissions process at top universities. While elite schools with large endowments and federal grants generally do well at providing financial support to low-income students, there seems to be limited awareness of these resources. Policies to recruit and accept low-income students appear to mitigate these issues on the institutional level, while government funding towards programs such as Pell Grants increase educational accessibility from the national level.

Between campaign promises of tuition-free college from Bernie Sanders, the “Turning the Tide” report published by Harvard’s Graduate School of Education and its subsequent endorsements by the admissions offices of many of the nation’s top elite schools, the topic of making college affordable and accessible to low-income students is becoming more of a public issue and priority.[2] A remaining question, however, is how accessible elite universities actually are for students in poverty and which admissions policies hurt or help low-income applicants. This article will explore whether low-income students are at a disadvantage prior to and during the college application process and the potential for policy solutions.



Prerequisites to the Application Process

Recent high school graduates now studying at elite universities will recall the long process of building their applications and resumes over time. A majority of this comes well before students go to fill out their Common Application and students without a head start often fall behind. While colleges look at extracurriculars and standardized tests back to students’ freshman year, not all applicants are aware of this scope.

Firstly, a student’s ability to perform well on standardized tests prior to applying to colleges has been linked with socioeconomic factors. A study conducted by Saul Geiser at the University of California, Berkeley, on SAT and ACT performance suggests factors outside of students’ control, including family income, parental education, and race/ethnicity, account for 33% of the variance in scores between test takers, putting students of low socioeconomic status at a huge disadvantage in this area.[3] In short, where any given student’s score stands compared to their peers can be largely accounted for by socioeconomic barriers, factors that need to be remedied for during the admissions process.

In addition, compared to students coming from households with higher family income, low-income students are less likely to participate in extracurricular activities, creating an activity gap.   Due to “the rising costs of sport teams and school clubs” along with “parents’ uncertain work schedules and precarious household budgets”, [4] 75% of middle and upper-class seniors participated in at least one extracurricular, as opposed to 56% of low-income students, with strong evidence for a downward trend in participation in low-income brackets over the last few decades.[5] Because top universities increasingly prefer the applications of candidates with impressive resumes demonstrating achievement and involvement outside the classroom, low-income students without a suite of extracurriculars on their applications are becoming less competitive.[6]

(Image: Profile of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students Source: Brookings Institute)

(Image: Profile of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students Source: Brookings Institute)

(Image: Comparison of College Application Portfolios Amongst High-Income and Low-Income Students Source: Brookings Institute)

(Image: Comparison of College Application Portfolios Amongst High-Income and Low-Income Students Source: Brookings Institute)

College Application

Low-income students face two significant obstacles on the path towards admission: barriers to apply and disadvantages in the admissions review. There are a variety of reasons why low-income students may not even apply to elite schools, even if they could get in. One, as identified by Stanford economist Caroline Hoxby, is location.[7] Students who live outside of large metropolitan centers are often ignored by college recruiters and do not get the proper information about selective schools. This leads to widespread “under-matching” for many low-income rural students, in which they end up at local or community colleges that are lower in academic rigor than universities of higher standing in which the students’ achievement levels would be matched.[8]

Another reason for not applying is poor counseling. Hoxby says counselors “may not have gone to selective colleges themselves,” adding that, “…they’re really busy, and the students who require the most attention aren’t usually the good kids with good grades.”[9] Without access to quality counseling in schools, where there is often a 400 student-to-counselor ratio, many high achieving students miss out on the opportunity to gain insight on the process from their counselor and take advantage of resources the counselor may have at their disposal.[10]

Another crucial reason many low-income students don’t apply is a conception that selective schools are “out of their league”, both academically and financially. What Hoxby, however, notes is that selective schools are actually “cheaper for low-income high achievers than colleges that have fewer resources,” though most low-income families are unaware of this due to the advertised cost of attendance and historical perceptions of elite institutions.[11] Perceived and real costs, in addition to the lack of knowledge of financial assistance, in standardized testing, application fees, tuition, cost of living, and transportation discourage low-income students from applying to a variety of schools, particularly “reach” schools that may advertise higher sticker prices.[12]

While barriers to admissions often deter low-income students from applying to institutions of higher learning, the ones who do might still be at a disadvantage due to admissions processes within universities. For one, the “holistic review” approach many schools employ takes weight away from test scores and GPAs, which may hurt low-income students who lack diverse extracurriculars due to the aforementioned “activity gap”. To be sure, there is indeed an income-correlation with standardized testing as well, but it’s far cheaper in terms of study resources to prepare for the SAT than it is to fund an expensive and involved extracurricular career. Furthermore, admissions policies common at elite universities include a consideration of legacy status and family donations for acceptance; low-income students rarely enjoy these benefits.

(Image: Percent of High School Graduates Enrolled in 2 or 4 Year College by Income Level Source: Pew Research Center)

(Image: Percent of High School Graduates Enrolled in 2 or 4 Year College by Income Level Source: Pew Research Center)

Policy Solutions and Suggestions

Many different initiatives have been created with the aim of reducing the university admissions gap, such as the Coalition Application, designed by the Coalition for Access, Affordability and Success. This collaborative of several dozen top tier universities sought to create an alternate application that reflected what they believe were the most important aspects of a candidate’s portfolio, and this is now being accepted for the 2017-2018 application season at many major elite institutions.[13] The Coalition Application aims to restructure the way applications are structured and ultimately judged, to be more inclusive of a variety of factors that are currently less emphasized, like the relative availability of educational resources for students of varying socioeconomic status. However, from a governmental standpoint, research points to two policy changes that should be made in concert to increase the number of low income students at selective schools: targeting and increasing the amount of information on federal and institutional financial support towards low-income students, and increasing the number of Pell Grant recipients at universities through federal funding and admissions policies at universities.

Tailored and targeted information on financial assistance would help because one of the primary barriers to apply lies within students’ and their families’ misconceptions about affordability. Caroline Hoxby points to the fact that just providing an “informational tool-kit” with information about programs and respective adjusted costs of attendance made students 53 percent more likely to apply, 78 percent more likely to get admitted, and 50 percent more likely to enroll in a selective institution.[14] The government spends $1 billion annually on different initiatives to increase the number of disadvantaged student enrolled in colleges, but those initiatives, according to a Brookings Institute and Princeton University study, have “no major effects on college enrollment or completion.”[15] By reevaluating these programs for effectiveness and channeling more resources towards disseminating targeted facts about both public and private universities will likely help to bridge the gap.

Finally, public and private schools can adopt policies that would aim, to admit low-income students such that Pell Grant recipients make up at least 20% of undergraduate student populations.[16] 20% is about half of the proportion of all undergraduate students receiving Pell Grant aid, and many universities could admit the necessary number of students to reach 20% without compromising significant financial resources or test score averages.[17] The impacts of reaching such a goal at the university level cannot be understated. As a study published by Dr. Jeffery Denning in the National Bureau of Economic Research shows, Pell Grant aid not only significantly increases the likelihood of low-income students obtaining a degree, but the costs are also fully recouped through the increase in taxed income of recipients in the years following graduation.[18] Consequently, despite the Trump Administration’s proposal to cut funding to federal student financial aid, funding and eligibility for Pell Grants ought to be increased to bridge the gaps to educational access and increase societal welfare without incurring significant economic costs.[19] [20] However, policymakers should leave discretion of proportions to admit to institutions themselves rather than passing mandates, as increasing the number of Pell Grant recipients may have impacts on the number of minority and international students that can be admitted, potentially decreasing cultural and ethnic diversity on campuses.[21]

Student Blog Disclaimer
  • The views expressed on the Student Blog are the author’s opinions and don’t necessarily represent the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative’s strategies, recommendations, or opinions.

References

  [1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/18/upshot/some-colleges-have-more-students-from-the-top-1-percent-than-the-bottom-60.html?_r=0

  [2] http://mcc.gse.harvard.edu/files/gse-mcc/files/20160120_mcc_ttt_execsummary_interactive.pdf

  [3] https://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/growing-correlation-between-race-and-sat-scores-new-findings-california-saul-geiser

  [4] https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/01/the-activity-gap/384961/

  [5] http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may13/vol70/num08/The-Widening-Income-Achievement-Gap.aspx

  [6] http://vue.annenberginstitute.org/issues/40/inequity-outside-classroom-growing-class-differences-participation-extracurricular

  [7] http://www.npr.org/2015/03/16/393339590/why-many-smart-low-income-students-dont-apply-to-elite-schools

  [8] Ibid.

  [9] Ibid.

  [10] Ibid.

  [11] Ibid.

  [12] https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/increasing_college_opportunity_for_low-income_students_report.pdf

  [13] http://coalitionforcollegeaccess.org/

  [14] http://rooseveltinstitute.org/millennial-pulsefailing-low-income-students-how-targeted-college-information-could-improve/

  [15] https://www.brookings.edu/interactives/improving-college-prep-for-low-income-students/

  [16] https://cew-7632.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/The-20-Percent-Solution-web.pdf

  [17] Ibid.

  [18] http://www.nber.org/papers/w23860.pdf

  [19] https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-postsecondary/news/2017/05/03/431855/congressional-budget-rejects-president-trumps-higher-education-cuts-now/

  [20] http://www.nber.org/papers/w23860.pdf

  [21] https://cew-7632.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/The-20-Percent-Solution-web.pdf

PENN WHARTON PPI
RESOURCE SPOTLIGHT:

  • <h3>The World Bank Data (U.S.)</h3><p><img width="130" height="118" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image484 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/130/height/118/484_world-bank-logo.rev.1407788945.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1406" data-max-h="1275"/>The <strong>World Bank</strong> provides World Development Indicators, Surveys, and data on Finances and Climate Change.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states" target="_blank">http://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>The Penn World Table</h3><p> The Penn World Table provides purchasing power parity and national income accounts converted to international prices for 189 countries/territories for some or all of the years 1950-2010.</p><p><a href="https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt71/pwt71_form.php" target="_blank">Quick link.</a> </p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Bureau of Economic Research (Public Use Data Archive)</h3><p><img width="180" height="43" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/43/478_nber.rev.1407530465.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image478 lw_align_right" data-max-w="329" data-max-h="79"/>Founded in 1920, the <strong>National Bureau of Economic Research</strong> is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a greater understanding of how the economy works. The NBER is committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community.</p><p> Quick Link to <strong>Public Use Data Archive</strong>: <a href="http://www.nber.org/data/" target="_blank">http://www.nber.org/data/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>HUD State of the Cities Data Systems</h3><p><strong><img width="200" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image482 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/200/482_hud_logo.rev.1407788472.jpg 3x" data-max-w="612" data-max-h="613"/>The SOCDS provides data for individual Metropolitan Areas, Central Cities, and Suburbs.</strong> It is a portal for non-national data made available through a number of outside institutions (e.g. Census, BLS, FBI and others).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html" target="_blank">http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/socds.html</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Congressional Budget Office</h3><p><img width="180" height="180" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/180/380_cbo-logo.rev.1406822035.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image380 lw_align_right" data-max-w="180" data-max-h="180"/>Since its founding in 1974, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has produced independent analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process.</p><p> The agency is strictly nonpartisan and conducts objective, impartial analysis, which is evident in each of the dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates that its economists and policy analysts produce each year. CBO does not make policy recommendations, and each report and cost estimate discloses the agency’s assumptions and methodologies. <strong>CBO provides budgetary and economic information in a variety of ways and at various points in the legislative process.</strong> Products include baseline budget projections and economic forecasts, analysis of the President’s budget, cost estimates, analysis of federal mandates, working papers, and more.</p><p> Quick link to Products page: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/about/our-products</a></p><p> Quick link to Topics: <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/topics" target="_blank">http://www.cbo.gov/topics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Aviation Administration: Accident & Incident Data</h3><p><img width="100" height="100" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image80 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/100/height/100/80_faa-logo.rev.1402681347.jpg 3x" data-max-w="550" data-max-h="550"/>The NTSB issues an accident report following each investigation. These reports are available online for reports issued since 1996, with older reports coming online soon. The reports listing is sortable by the event date, report date, city, and state.</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/" target="_blank">http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>USDA Nutrition Assistance Data</h3><p><img width="180" height="124" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image485 lw_align_right" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/180/height/124/485_usda_logo.rev.1407789238.jpg 3x" data-max-w="1233" data-max-h="850"/>Data and research regarding the following <strong>USDA Nutrition Assistance</strong> programs are available through this site:</p><ul><li>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) </li><li>Food Distribution Programs </li><li>School Meals </li><li>Women, Infants and Children </li></ul><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics" target="_blank">http://www.fns.usda.gov/data-and-statistics</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Internal Revenue Service: Tax Statistics</h3><p><img width="155" height="200" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image486 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/155/height/200/486_irs_logo.rev.1407789424.jpg 2x" data-max-w="463" data-max-h="596"/>Find statistics on business tax, individual tax, charitable and exempt organizations, IRS operations and budget, and income (SOI), as well as statistics by form, products, publications, papers, and other IRS data.</p><p> Quick link to <strong>Tax Statistics, where you will find a wide range of tables, articles, and data</strong> that describe and measure elements of the U.S. tax system: <a href="http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2" target="_blank">http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Stats-2</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED®)</h3><p><strong><img width="180" height="79" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/180/height/79/481_fred-logo.rev.1407788243.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image481 lw_align_right" data-max-w="222" data-max-h="97"/>An online database consisting of more than 72,000 economic data time series from 54 national, international, public, and private sources.</strong> FRED®, created and maintained by Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, goes far beyond simply providing data: It combines data with a powerful mix of tools that help the user understand, interact with, display, and disseminate the data.</p><p> Quick link to data page: <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series" target="_blank">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/tags/series</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>MapStats</h3><p> A feature of FedStats, MapStats allows users to search for <strong>state, county, city, congressional district, or Federal judicial district data</strong> (demographic, economic, and geographic).</p><p> Quick link: <a href="http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/" target="_blank">http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>NOAA National Climatic Data Center</h3><p><img width="200" height="198" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image483 lw_align_left" srcset="/live/image/scale/2x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 2x, /live/image/scale/3x/gid/4/width/200/height/198/483_noaa_logo.rev.1407788692.jpg 3x" data-max-w="954" data-max-h="945"/>NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) is responsible for preserving, monitoring, assessing, and providing public access to the Nation’s treasure of <strong>climate and historical weather data and information</strong>.</p><p> Quick link to home page: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCDC’s climate and weather datasets, products, and various web pages and resources: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/quick-links</a></p><p> Quick link to Text & Map Search: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/" target="_blank">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>
  • <h3>National Center for Education Statistics</h3><p><strong><img width="400" height="80" alt="" src="/live/image/gid/4/width/400/height/80/479_nces.rev.1407787656.jpg" class="lw_image lw_image479 lw_align_right" data-max-w="400" data-max-h="80"/>The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting and analyzing data related to education in the U.S. and other nations.</strong> NCES is located within the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences. NCES has an extensive Statistical Standards Program that consults and advises on methodological and statistical aspects involved in the design, collection, and analysis of data collections in the Center. To learn more about the NCES, <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/about/" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p><p> Quick link to NCES Data Tools: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/datatools/index.asp?DataToolSectionID=4</a></p><p> Quick link to Quick Tables and Figures: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables/</a></p><p> Quick link to NCES Fast Facts (Note: The primary purpose of the Fast Facts website is to provide users with concise information on a range of educational issues, from early childhood to adult learning.): <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/" target="_blank">http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/#</a></p><p>See all <a href="/data-resources/">data and resources</a> »</p>