The Importance of Public Private Partnerships in Accomplishing True, Lasting Global Development
September 27, 2017
The World Bank Group: A case in point
By Kirtika Challa
In 2016 the World Bank Group committed nearly $64.2 billion in loans, grants, equity investments and guarantees to its members and private businesses . On the other hand, as of 2016, total GDP for Emerging markets and developing economies (EM), based on Purchasing Power Parity, totaled $69.67 trillion, compared to $50.22 trillion for advanced economies . The EM GDP passed developed GDP for the first time in 2008 and the gap has only continued to widen with the IMF forecasting EM GDP to compose more than 60% of the global GDP by 2020. It is evident then, that the need significantly outweighs the scale of the resources that the World Bank has at its disposal to achieve its dual mandate of ending extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity.
On a more granular level, annual infrastructure investment needs in emerging markets total approximately Given the scale of the need it is apparent that for the World Bank to have a significant impact on development in the world, it must be able to leverage its own resources through the crowding in of private capital. This is the basis of current World Bank President Jim Kim’s “cascade” approach to the group’s development goals and why the WBG’s two institutions focused on private sector development. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), are at the center of this strategy.
Since 1956, the IFC has leveraged about $2.6 billion in capital from member governments to deliver more than $245 billion in financing for development . In 2016, IFC’s clients provided 2.4 million jobs, helped educate 4.6 million students, and treated nearly 32 million patients. They generated power for 48 million people, distributed water to nearly 22 million, and provided gas to more than 50 million . This level of impact is only possible through leveraging of private markets. As an example of IFC’s ability to crowd in investment, a few years ago IFC provided financing for an investment in cell phone towers in an emerging market country; a key infrastructure investment important to increase access to mobile data service where it doesn’t exist. IFC provided project financing in the form of a 9-yr loan to the client. Just recently, the company was able to refinance the loan using private capital, reducing the interest rate on the loan by 400 basis points relative to the IFC financing. Thus, IFC’s willingness and ability to successfully invest in more frontier markets clearly gave private capital the confidence to enter these markets, providing investors with good returns while also reducing the financing costs of the incumbent. Further, it frees up IFC capital to invest in regions or projects that do not yet have access to capital, to hopefully repeat the outcome.
The benefits from Public Private Partnerships can also be clearly seen at MIGA. As of FY 2016, MIGA’s outstanding gross exposure was $14.2bn  of which 45% was in IDA-eligible countries , 10% were in FSC countries  and $7.5Bn of this exposure was syndicated out to the private market, clearly demonstrating the ability of MIGA to leverage its capital. Furthermore, just in 2016 MIGA issued $4.3Bn in guarantees, which catalyzed $27.3Bn of investments, providing access to $787mm of financing for SMEs, g 24.2 million people with power, and providing employment to approximately 24,000 people.
As the political dynamic of the world shifts and larger member nations of the World Bank shift away from a global approach to progress and growth towards a more nationalistic view, the importance of the public private partnership becomes even more important. The only path forward for development then lies in creating markets and environments to incentivize capital inflow and the creation of bankable projects. More importantly, although aid and grants are important to achieve development goals, the more sustainable path forward is to create marketplaces where return is also achievable. Only then will development be lasting and self-sustaining. The World Bank Group’s ability to truly meet its dual mandate relies on these public private partnerships.
 IMF DataMapper, http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PPPGDP@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
 The International Development Association (IDA) is an international financial institution which offers concessional loans and grants to the world’s poorest developing countries. As of 2012, to borrow from the IDA’s concessional lending programs, a country’s gross national income (GNI) per capita must not exceed US$1,175.
Student Blog Disclaimer
The views expressed on the Student Blog are the author’s opinions and don’t necessarily represent the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative’s strategies, recommendations, or opinions.
Nuclear energy has the potential to assist nations in tackling climate change and sustain a rapidly growing world population. In the first part of this series on nuclear energy, I analyzed why nuclear energy is superior to other energy sources in achieving this end but also why current market forces prevent its growth. However, even if US legislators decided to pass legislation that aggressively expanded the country’s nuclear infrastructure, there are three primary non-market challenges with current U.S. policy, or lack thereof: a hostile public, the absence of a centralized nuclear waste disposal site, and concerns with proliferation and the imperilment of U.S. national security objectives. In order to responsibly expand nuclear energy capacities and prevent proliferation to hostile states, policy-makers have an obligation to address these issues. Not doing so may bear worse consequences than wantonly enlarging the United States’ atomic sector.
In 2015, Seattle legislators signed a bill to gradually increase the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour over several years. Businesses with fewer than 500 employees will still have until January of 2024 to deal with the full ramifications of the act. However, businesses that do not provide medical benefits and employ over 500 people were forced to pay their workers $15 dollars an hour starting this past January . Since then, two major studies have been published on the effects of the act, one concluding that it has had a positive effect on economic activity and employment and the other stating that it has made the labor market far too rigid.
Today private prisons house about 126,000 federal and state inmates . Orders issued under the Obama Administration to phase out the use of private prisons are now being reversed under the Trump Administration, which has caused some debates over the efficacy of private prisons to resurface. Chiefly, this reversal has sparked controversy over the economic benefits of private prisons in America, as the most avid dissidents highlight problems with the economic argument for private prisons and even moderate objectors point to inconclusive data as a poor indicator of their advantages.
Trust Busting in Silicon Valley: Analyzing the Role of Antitrust Regulation in the Technology IndustryFrom checking the weather to reading the news, from interacting on social media to shopping for gifts, it is evident that technology plays an integral role in our daily lives. We can attribute the products that we use every day with just a few prominent technology companies. “Tech giants” or even the “Frightful Five,” the collective names given to Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, and Google (and by extension, its parent company Alphabet) underscore the idea that these technology companies significantly influence both our daily routines and the political and economic changes in our nation at large .
Healthcare spending accounts for just under one-fifth of the US economy, amounting to an enormous $3.4 trillion in 2016 . Politicians from both sides of the aisle have tried their hand at passing cost containment measures to slow its growth, which has consistently outpaced GDP growth rates. With the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) attempted to cut costs by reshaping the way providers are paid to manage care. As a result, it began to recognize and reward a new hybrid structuring of providers: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). As ACOs become more popular under new payment schemes, it is essential to track their ability to reduce costs and improve quality. The Trump administration’s policy changes stand to shape not only providers’ care coordination, but also the trajectory of the healthcare industry.
Since Hurricane Maria struck Puerto Rico, the island’s leaders have been asking the federal government for more emergency aid and long-term recovery funds. Resident Commissioner for Puerto Rico Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon requested, “Congress [approve] an aid package that is commensurate with the level of devastation,” while Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo of Guam said she will, “Seek a firm commitment that the House provide fair and robust emergency assistance to U.S. territories devastated by natural disasters in any bills considered for the remainder of the Congress.”  The federal government must determine how much assistance is required to adequately respond to a natural disaster of this scale and how to balance the need for short-term relief and long-term recovery.
Sugar sweetened beverage taxes, commonly referred to as soda taxes, have been on the rise in American municipal governments as a potential policy solution to both a public health crisis and a revenue shortage . However, in cities like Philadelphia where these sugary beverage taxes have been implemented, they have become a target for the scrutiny of residents and economists alike. Governments that have implemented soda taxes commonly cite how the tax revenue and the tax itself could help tackle obesity, but this claim is still subject to debate.
Since 1976, private citizens have been barred from introducing private lawsuits against foreign nations under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). This law has been the basis for United States’ domestic legal engagement with other countries for decades, and has undergone significant revisions since its inception. Actions taken by the legislative branch over the past few decades have drastically changed the original FSIA and introduced new challenges regarding implementation and potential ramifications against the United States in legal systems abroad. This article explores how a recent amendment to the FSIA known as the Justice Against Sponsors of Terror Act (JASTA), as well as prior revisions, represent a significant reduction in the sovereign immunity laid out in FSIA, as well as a public policy and diplomatic challenge for the United States moving forward.
First proposed in 2009, India’s Aadhaar biometric ID system represents a complete overhaul of India’s approach to identification. The Aadhaar ID links your fingerprint and iris to everything from tax filings to bank accounts. Despite criticism relating to privacy concerns, proponents argue that Aadhaar has the potential to propel the Indian economy towards business transparency and fraud reduction.
Over the span of recent decades, the federal legalization of marijuana has been a popular topic of discussion within the political arena. One aspect less frequently introduced is the financial impact legalization has within the banking sector. At the moment, most cannabis companies are unable to take out federal loans or establish any form of credit, since marijuana is federally illegal and therefore federally regulated banks are unable to work directly with marijuana businesses. A few states have legalized the use and distribution, of cannabis, both recreationally and medicinally, but this legal standing is insufficient for distributors to access services provided by national banks. All of this has led to volatility within the marijuana business structure and a business model built in violation of banking standards.