The Importance of Public Private Partnerships in Accomplishing True, Lasting Global Development
September 27, 2017
The World Bank Group: A case in point
By Kirtika Challa
In 2016 the World Bank Group committed nearly $64.2 billion in loans, grants, equity investments and guarantees to its members and private businesses . On the other hand, as of 2016, total GDP for Emerging markets and developing economies (EM), based on Purchasing Power Parity, totaled $69.67 trillion, compared to $50.22 trillion for advanced economies . The EM GDP passed developed GDP for the first time in 2008 and the gap has only continued to widen with the IMF forecasting EM GDP to compose more than 60% of the global GDP by 2020. It is evident then, that the need significantly outweighs the scale of the resources that the World Bank has at its disposal to achieve its dual mandate of ending extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity.
On a more granular level, annual infrastructure investment needs in emerging markets total approximately Given the scale of the need it is apparent that for the World Bank to have a significant impact on development in the world, it must be able to leverage its own resources through the crowding in of private capital. This is the basis of current World Bank President Jim Kim’s “cascade” approach to the group’s development goals and why the WBG’s two institutions focused on private sector development. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), are at the center of this strategy.
Since 1956, the IFC has leveraged about $2.6 billion in capital from member governments to deliver more than $245 billion in financing for development . In 2016, IFC’s clients provided 2.4 million jobs, helped educate 4.6 million students, and treated nearly 32 million patients. They generated power for 48 million people, distributed water to nearly 22 million, and provided gas to more than 50 million . This level of impact is only possible through leveraging of private markets. As an example of IFC’s ability to crowd in investment, a few years ago IFC provided financing for an investment in cell phone towers in an emerging market country; a key infrastructure investment important to increase access to mobile data service where it doesn’t exist. IFC provided project financing in the form of a 9-yr loan to the client. Just recently, the company was able to refinance the loan using private capital, reducing the interest rate on the loan by 400 basis points relative to the IFC financing. Thus, IFC’s willingness and ability to successfully invest in more frontier markets clearly gave private capital the confidence to enter these markets, providing investors with good returns while also reducing the financing costs of the incumbent. Further, it frees up IFC capital to invest in regions or projects that do not yet have access to capital, to hopefully repeat the outcome.
The benefits from Public Private Partnerships can also be clearly seen at MIGA. As of FY 2016, MIGA’s outstanding gross exposure was $14.2bn  of which 45% was in IDA-eligible countries , 10% were in FSC countries  and $7.5Bn of this exposure was syndicated out to the private market, clearly demonstrating the ability of MIGA to leverage its capital. Furthermore, just in 2016 MIGA issued $4.3Bn in guarantees, which catalyzed $27.3Bn of investments, providing access to $787mm of financing for SMEs, g 24.2 million people with power, and providing employment to approximately 24,000 people.
As the political dynamic of the world shifts and larger member nations of the World Bank shift away from a global approach to progress and growth towards a more nationalistic view, the importance of the public private partnership becomes even more important. The only path forward for development then lies in creating markets and environments to incentivize capital inflow and the creation of bankable projects. More importantly, although aid and grants are important to achieve development goals, the more sustainable path forward is to create marketplaces where return is also achievable. Only then will development be lasting and self-sustaining. The World Bank Group’s ability to truly meet its dual mandate relies on these public private partnerships.
 IMF DataMapper, http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PPPGDP@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
 The International Development Association (IDA) is an international financial institution which offers concessional loans and grants to the world’s poorest developing countries. As of 2012, to borrow from the IDA’s concessional lending programs, a country’s gross national income (GNI) per capita must not exceed US$1,175.
Student Blog Disclaimer
The views expressed on the Student Blog are the author’s opinions and don’t necessarily represent the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative’s strategies, recommendations, or opinions.
In June of 2016, former Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter removed one of the final barriers to military service by announcing new rules that would allow transgender individuals to openly serve in the military. Prior to this, transgender people would have been discharged or otherwise separated from the military just for their gender under Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6130.03: Medical Standards for Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction in the Military Services. Just one year later, in July 2017, President Donald Trump tweeted that the U.S. “will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military” because the military “must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgenders in the military would entail”.
It is estimated that one individual organ, eye, and tissue donor can save up to 75 lives . Currently an average of 22 individuals die each day waiting to be matched for a transplant . Donated tissues and organs both have lifesaving potential, but unlike donated organs, donated tissue is also purchased by biotechnology and cosmetic companies for research purposes. Most donors, however, are not aware of the differences between organ and tissue donation, including how it is removed, used, and regulated . Even fewer are aware that by registering for organ donation, they have become tissue donors by default and that their tissues can be sold for up to $80,000 to profitable companies . In order to increase transparency and not lose informed consent of donors, registration for tissue donation and organ donation in the United States should be separate processes.
Google, Facebook, Twitter, Snap, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple — these companies have become household names, and the world today heavily relies on their services. To many, the benefits of cheap and easy connection to information are obvious, ranging from increased educational and career opportunities to an increased rate of technological innovation. However, as the pace of this progress accelerates, two distinct issues have remained concerning: the use of these technologies and access to them. The topic of this article mostly focuses on how people still lack access to the Internet. This lack of access to and of use of the Internet is known as the “digital divide.”
Leo drives a mid-2000s Acura TSX and arrives at the pickup point in front of a train station in Trenton, New Jersey. I’m headed home from New York City for the Thanksgiving holiday. Leo gives me a hand with my suitcase, and in under a minute, we’re off, driving Interstate 276 West most of the way there. The 26.66 mile trip takes 45 minutes. It costs me $34.68 on one of the most popular rideshare platforms, of which Leo receives about $25, minus the cost of gas, tolls, and vehicle mileage. Leo is a pretty talkative guy, and the subject turns to the various driving platforms, like Uber and Lyft. Leo is a young guy, and he tells me he’s one of the approximately 1 in 4 drivers who does not have health insurance.
Many young Americans leave home and never return. In particular, this trend can be seen in rural America. 1,350 counties “non-metro” counties have lost population since 2010. Since the mid 1990s, rural population growth has been significantly lower than urban areas. The movement of people has resulted in national economic growth, but there are consequences. Behind these numbers lie worrisome consequences.
Caffeine has been heralded as the world’s most popular drug. However, as more people want their coffees to go, the industry has failed to confront the waste from single-use cups. In the last two decades, the United Kingdom has seen a 400% increase in the number of coffee shops. The sheer volume of waste affects both the environment and the country’s waste management infrastructure . In the UK alone, people throw away 2.5 billion disposable coffee cups a year . The scope of this problem is magnified by the difficulty of recycling wax-lined paper (the most common material for coffee cups), with only 0.25% of these cups being reprocessed . In order to combat the growing practical and environmental effects of throwing away single-use cups, UK lawmakers have stepped in, and are considering instituting a “latte levy,” a new tax to influence on-the-go coffee drinkers.
Pharmaceutical drug price hikes have now become a common feature in American news. From Martin Shkreli’s infamous Daraprim price hike that saw a $737 increase to the chemotherapy drug Cosmogen that currently sells for $1,400 in the U.S. compared to $20-30 overseas, the problem is clearly systemic . Many important cancer drugs, including Gilead’s Sovaldi, Merck’s Keytruda, and Vertex’ Kalydeco all cost over $80,000 for a course of treatment . Often prices increase are unrelated to any new research and development done. There is a clear need to address such drastic drug price increases in order to prevent these dramatic hikes and create a more stable biopharmaceutical market.
The state of American infrastructure figures prominently in current national policy discussion, prompted by poor report cards, energized political campaigns, and recent executive initiatives. Severe underfunding of needed infrastructure projects has prompted proposals from both sides of the political aisle, with public-private partnerships (P3s) featuring prominently. This article evaluates and offers perspective on different types of P3s, examining their benefits and costs and the Trump administration’s plans.
Nuclear energy has the potential to assist nations in tackling climate change and sustain a rapidly growing world population. In the first part of this series on nuclear energy, I analyzed why nuclear energy is superior to other energy sources in achieving this end but also why current market forces prevent its growth. However, even if US legislators decided to pass legislation that aggressively expanded the country’s nuclear infrastructure, there are three primary non-market challenges with current U.S. policy, or lack thereof: a hostile public, the absence of a centralized nuclear waste disposal site, and concerns with proliferation and the imperilment of U.S. national security objectives. In order to responsibly expand nuclear energy capacities and prevent proliferation to hostile states, policy-makers have an obligation to address these issues. Not doing so may bear worse consequences than wantonly enlarging the United States’ atomic sector.
In 2015, Seattle legislators signed a bill to gradually increase the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour over several years. Businesses with fewer than 500 employees will still have until January of 2024 to deal with the full ramifications of the act. However, businesses that do not provide medical benefits and employ over 500 people were forced to pay their workers $15 dollars an hour starting this past January . Since then, two major studies have been published on the effects of the act, one concluding that it has had a positive effect on economic activity and employment and the other stating that it has made the labor market far too rigid.